Crude cAMP Dependent Protein Kinase with Different ATP Photoaffinity Analogs
by
J. Curt Pendergrass Ph.D. The purpose of these experiments was to demonstrate the dramatic effect that the choice of buffer and pH can have on photolabeling of cAMP dependent protein kinase (PKA). Never assume the buffer and pH that you have been using in the past to assess catalytic activity will be the same as the optimum conditions for photolabeling. Many times they not and assuming otherwise may mean the difference between success and failure when it comes to photolabeling a particular protein. In addition, the choice of nucleotide photoaffinity analog can have a dramatic effect on the photolabeling efficiency. For example, base modified ATP photoaffinity analogs such as 8N3ATP and 2N3ATP may exhibit a dramatically different photolabeling profiles than the gamma phosphate modified analogs ATP[g]AA and ATP[g]BP. In general, we have found that BisTris, MES, sodium phosphate and Tris-HCl all give good results when attempting to photolabel most proteins.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Experiment
#5. [g32P]-8-Azidoadenosine
5'-triphosphate Versus [a32P]-8-Azidoadenosine
5'-triphosphate Photolabeling
of Purified PKA Catalytic Subunit:
Effect of Buffer and pH on Photolabeling
Technical Information or General Inquiries Contact
Dr. Anjan Bhattacharyya, Ph.D.
|







